On January 20, 2025, President Trump’s first day in office, he issued an Executive Order titled “DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT”.
“Section 1. Purpose. Across the country, ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex have increasingly used legal and other socially coercive means to permit men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women, from women’s domestic abuse shelters to women’s workplace showers. This is wrong. Efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex fundamentally attack women by depriving them of their dignity, safety, and well-being. The erasure of sex in language and policy has a corrosive impact not just on women but on the validity of the entire American system. Basing Federal policy on truth is critical to scientific inquiry, public safety, morale, and trust in government itself.
Sec. 2. Policy and Definitions. It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality, and the following definitions shall govern all Executive interpretation of and application of Federal law and administration policy:
(a) “Sex” shall refer to an individual’s immutable biological classification as either male or female. “Sex” is not a synonym for and does not include the concept of “gender identity.”
(b) “Women” or “woman” and “girls” or “girl” shall mean adult and juvenile human females, respectively. . . .
(d) “Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.
(e) “Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.
GOVERNMENT ID’S TO ACCURATELY REFLECT HOLDER’S SEX
The Executive Order directed in Sec. 3 :
“(d) The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall implement changes to require that government-issued identification documents, including passports, visas, and Global Entry cards, accurately reflect the holder’s sex, as defined under section 2 of this order; and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall ensure that applicable personnel records accurately report Federal employees’ sex, as defined by section 2 of this order.
(e) Agencies shall remove all statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications, or other internal and external messages that promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology, and shall cease issuing such statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications or other messages. Agency forms that require an individual’s sex shall list male or female, and shall not request gender identity. Agencies shall take all necessary steps, as permitted by law, to end the Federal funding of gender ideology.
NO FEDERAL FUNDS TO PROMOTE GENDER IDEOLOGY
(g) Federal funds shall not be used to promote gender ideology. Each agency shall assess grant conditions and grantee preferences and ensure grant funds do not promote gender ideology.”
GOD CREATED MALE AND FEMALE
"So God created human beings in his own image. In the image of God he created them; male and female he created them." Genesis 1:27, New Living Translation.
What did Jesus say about this issue: “Haven’t you read the Scriptures?” Jesus replied. “They record that from the beginning ‘God made them male and female.’” Matthew 19:4, New Living Translation.
Trump is simply following God. As Trump pointed out after he escaped assassination, “I was saved by God to make America great again.”
BOSTOCK V. CLAYTON COUNTY “LEGALLY UNTENABLE”
The executive Order declared as “legally untenable” the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), which addressed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the issue of “sex”. The Executive Order directed the Attorney General to issue guidance “to correct the misapplication of the Supreme Court’s decision.”
In 2020, we wrote an article titled “One-upmanship: God created two sexes; Supreme Court creates a third sex.” Here is the link: http://thefilipinochronicle.com/2020/07/31/one-upmanship-god-created-two-sexes-supreme-court-creates-a-third-sex/
The issue was the meaning of “sex” in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a)(1) which provides that it is unlawful “for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual . . . because of such individual’s . . sex.” The employers said that the term “sex” in 1964 when the statute was enacted referred to status as either male or female as determined by reproductive biology. The Supreme Court on June 15, 2020, held, 6-3, that an employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights. The majority opined that it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex. The majority rejected the employers’ contention that homosexuality and transgender status are distinct concepts from sex, and that if Congress wanted to address these matters in Title VII, it would have referred to them specifically.
Justice Alito dissented, with Justice Thomas concurring, saying that there is only one word for what the Court has done today: legislation. He noted that Title VII prohibits discrimination because of “sex” and in 1964 “this meant discrimination because of the genetic and anatomical characteristics that men and women have at the time of birth.” He had not found a single dictionary that defined “sex” to mean “sexual orientation, gender identity, or transgender status.”
TWO MEN ENGAGE IN SEXUAL INTERCOURSE
Have you ever seen two men engage in sexual intercourse? In the “60’s, my employer, a White Russian whose forbears had fled Byelorussia and settled in Macau, brought me to Macau when it was still under Portuguese control. We went to a show where two men engaged in sexual intercourse. It was the most disgusting thing I have ever seen. There were also two women who engaged in sexual intercourse. It was equally disgusting. I told him I needed a drink. He brought me to a bar where I drowned my disgust with Russian vodka.
Atty. Emmanuel Samonte Tipon was a Fulbright and Smith-Mundt scholar to Yale Law School where he was awarded a Master of Laws degree specializing in Constitutional Law. He graduated with a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of the Philippines. He placed third in the 1955 bar examinations. He is admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court, New York, and the Philippines. He practices federal law, with emphasis on constitutional issues, immigration law, and appellate federal criminal defense. He was the Dean and a Professor of Law of the College of Law, Northwestern University, Philippines. He has written law books and legal articles for the world’s most prestigious legal publishers including Thomson West and Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co. and writes columns for newspapers. He wrote the case notes and annotations for the entire Immigration and Nationality Act published by The Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co. and Bancroft-Whitney Co. (now Thomson Reuters). He wrote the best-seller "Winning by Knowing Your Election Laws.” Atty. Tipon was born in Laoag City, Philippines. Cell Phone (808) 225-2645. E-Mail: attorneytipon@gmail.com filamlaw@yahoo.com. Website: https://www.tiponimmigrationguide.com
The information provided in this article is for general information only. It is not legal advice. Publication of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you or reading by you does not establish or constitute an attorney-client relationship.
What's Up Atty 2025 03 10 Only two sexes-Trump
1248